Whether you are a programmer or not, its impact on you is unavoidable

Shor’s Algorithm: The Most Misunderstood in Tech

What if I told you the future of our technology-based world hinges on something most people have never heard of? We are talking about Shor’s algorithm— it’s not just a tool; it’s way more than that. It is already shaking the foundations of modern security, transforming the way we design quantum machines, and enabling possibilities we’re only beginning to imagine.

Scott Aaronson, one of the top guys in complexity theory, calls Shor’s algorithm “one of the major scientific achievements of the late 20th century” . He wasn’t exaggerating. This algorithm targets one of the toughest nuts in classical computing — factoring large numbers, the bedrock of today’s public-key cryptography.

The security of your bank account, emails, online shopping, and a long etcetera relies on the fact that factoring massive numbers (used in RSA encryption) is computationally impossible for classical computers within any reasonable timeframe. But Shor’s algorithm changes the game— and makes it solvable in polynomial time if we can build quantum machines that meet the necessary scale and fault tolerance.

Right now, we’re nowhere near factoring RSA-2048 on actual hardware, but Shor’s algorithm lays out the path. It’s a reminder that if (or when) a sufficiently powerful quantum computer arrives, factoring numbers that would take classical machines billions of years could take only hours — or even minutes.

Not Just for Breaking Crypto — It’s a Tool for Building, Too

But there’s much more to the story. Shor’s algorithm isn’t just about breaking stuff. It’s also about building. It acts like a universal yardstick, letting us benchmark and compare quantum hardware designs without constructing every possible prototype. By simulating Shor’s algorithm on classical machines — or on the noisy, intermediate-scale quantum devices we have today (known as NISQ devices) — we can figure out which roadblocks lie ahead. It’s like a virtual wind tunnel for quantum engineering, revealing which designs are worth pursuing and which might be dead ends, all before we pour billions into the wrong ideas.

Qubits vs. Qudits: The Spin Showdown

We can’t talk about Shor’s algorithm without also talking about qubits — the spin-1/2 systems that let us encode the two states ∣0⟩ and ∣1⟩. They’re the basic units of quantum computers and still relatively straightforward compared to higher-spin options, yet they hold the seeds for exponential speedups.

But what does “spin-1/2” actually mean? In simple terms, spin is a quantum property that describes how many distinct states a particle can have. A spin-1/2 particle has exactly two basic states (often labeled “up” and “down”), which is why it naturally encodes a qubit — the quantum version of a 0/1 bit.

When you move beyond spin-1/2, you get qudits: quantum units that can hold more than two states. For example:

• A spin-3/2 particle has four possible states, sometimes called “quaterbits.”
• A spin-7/2 particle has eight possible states, sometimes dubbed “quonions.”

Because qudits can store more information in a single unit, you need fewer of them overall. While controlling and stabilizing these extra states might initially seem trickier, it’s actually not the case — their energy requirements for tackling similarly complex tasks are significantly lower compared to spin-1/2 qubits. Still, spin-1/2 qubits remain the most popular choice today, largely because they’re perceived as simpler to work with. However, a more careful quantitative analysis with the Shor algorithm reveals that, on the contrary, the most optimal choice is quaterbits (see Tables 1 and 2 below).

Quaterbits and Quonions: The Next Frontier

Quaterbits (Spin-3/2) rely on something called quaternions, a mathematical extension of complex numbers. Quaternions don’t commute, which means the order of operations matters — a concept that adds complexity to quantum gate design but also allows you to pack more computing power into each unit.

Quonions (Spin-7/2) push this idea even further by tapping into octonions, the “next level” beyond quaternions. Unlike quaternions, octonions lose both commutativity ab≠ba and associativity (ab)c≠a(bc), retaining only “alternativity.” This makes them theoretically extremely powerful, but also notoriously challenging to control in hardware. Think of quonions as trying to tame a hurricane of potential — fantastic if you can manage it, but demanding advanced error correction and robust hardware to keep the noise at bay.

Does that sound too far-fetched to you? While writing this article, two huge breakthroughs are bringing us closer to quaterbit-powered quantum machines that actually work. First, the so-called Danish duo-light device tackles network issues by keeping quaterbits in sync and protecting their entanglement from outside noise—basically, it’s like noise-canceling for quantum systems. Second, semi-Dirac fermions handle state stability, making sure quaterbits’ four states stay solid and their superpositions don’t collapse. As you’ve noticed by now, together, these advancements clear the path for our quaterbits to go from theory to reality, making traditional qubits a thing of the past.

Shor’s Algorithm: The Ultimate Stress Test

And this is why we need the Shor’s algorithm , while not the only benchmark in quantum computing (others include Grover’s algorithm or quantum chemistry simulations), Shor’s factoring is an ideal stress test for error correction, gate fidelity, and resource requirements. By running or simulating Shor’s algorithm on different quantum architectures, researchers can gauge hardware feasibility without building every possible variant.

Of course, none of this happens overnight. Transitioning from the noisy quantum processors we have today to full-blown, fault-tolerant devices that can crack RSA-2048 remains a monumental engineering challenge. We’ll need better qubit designs, robust error-correcting codes, and breakthroughs in materials science. That’s why Shor’s algorithm stands as both a lighthouse and a storm warning: it illuminates the path to extraordinary computational power but reveals the scale of the tempest we must navigate to realize it.

Final Word: From Sci-Fi to Reality

So, yep, Shor’s algorithm still feels like something straight out of science fiction, and terms like “quaterbits” and “quonions” sound like they belong in a mad scientist’s lab. But the path forward is clear: by using Shor’s algorithm as our go-to benchmark, we’re on the right path to refining error correction methods, and edging closer to the next era of computation. Will it happen in the next few years? If the big tech investors and stakeholders don’t interfere and do not trigger another tech bubble, it will happen sooner than we expect.

But you can see how what seemed impossible just a few years ago is now backed by real research and early prototypes. And here’s the best part: as qudits can fit more computing power into fewer “slots,” they will leverage AI’s potential by several orders of magnitude beyond what’s possible today. That means quantum-driven AI could handle massive problems and complex searches in ways we can hardly imagine. There’s still plenty of ground to cover, but qudits aren’t just flashy buzzwords — they’re quickly becoming a real part of our tech toolset and not kinda black magic.